DISCLOSURE OF AUDIT TENURE
The Regulatory
Board (IRBA), in terms of Section 9 and 10 read with sections 1, 2 and 3 of the
Auditing Profession Act, Act 26 of 2005, published a Rule in the Government
Gazette Nr 39475 of 04 December 2015 which makes it mandatory that all
auditor′s reports on Annual Financial Statements shall disclose the number of
years which the audit firm / sole practitioner has been the auditor of the
entity (audit tenure). A predecessor audit firm in this context refers to an
audit firm where there has been mergers/de-mergers or other combinations in the
audit firm and an audit firm shall therefore include a predecessor audit firm
Audit tenure
refers to the length of the auditor-client relationship. Thus tenure includes
the period that the predecessor audit firms (where there has been
mergers/de-mergers or other combinations in the audit firm) issued audit
reports on the entity.
This rule
applies to audit reports issued on the Annual Financial Statements of all
public interest entities, as defined in the Companies Act of 2008 and
prescribed by the Regulatory Board from time to time, for periods ending on or
after 31 December 2015.
The objective of
the above Rule is to disclose the length of time which the audit firm had been
involved with the client. The term ‘involved’ is limited to the format through
which the firm traded. Meaning, if it was a partnership before and then
incorporated under a different name. It is still considered the same firm as
far as disclosure of audit tenure is concerned. This is about an auditor who
prepares and signs an audit opinion and not any other firm who may assist the
signee in the conduct of his or her duties.
This rule does
not apply if the signee contracts another audit firm to assist him or her to
conduct the audit. It applies to the registered auditor whose name is on the
CoR44 (CIPC form - Notice of Change of Auditor or Company Secretary). In other
words that registered auditor is legally permitted to sign the audit report.
Comments